“If I couldn’t beat him then I don’t deserve to be in semis” : Fritz ends debate on lucky loser in main draws

Rafael Nadal’s decision to withdraw from the Wimbledon semi-finals against Nick Kyrgios revived an old debate in the online tennis world – should players withdrawing mid-way through a tournament be replaced by the player they defeated in the previous round?

Many fans, disappointed with Nadal’s withdrawal and the prospect of watching just one semi-final at the most prestigious tournament in the world, were wondering if Taylor Fritz, the man that Nadal defeated to get to the semis, should take his spot against Kyrgios in the last four.

Christopher Clarey, one of tennis’ most notable journalists who writes for The New York Times,, was among those who were wondering how to deal with such a scenario as he tweeted that the concept of a lucky loser after the first rounds should be explored, something that Pam Shriver, a former world No 3 in singles and top-ranked doubles player, was also pondering over.

While there was some support for such an idea, especially from a section of tennis fans, former world No 1 Andy Roddick was among those who were dead set against it.

One of the reasons that some wanted the lucky loser support gained some support was the high price for the men’s semi-final ticket at Wimbledon on Friday, which were in the range of 200 pounds for the two semi-finals.

With the second semi-final being replaced by women’s doubles matches, may found the 200 pounds price exorbitant for one men’s semi-final match.

The All England Club did address some of those concerns and offered a full refund for anyone who wished to get one if they applied before midnight on Friday.

Fritz says he is not looking for handouts

Fritz, the player who found himself unknowingly involved in the debate, had the last word on the debate though, as the American let everyone know that he was not looking for any handouts.

“Nah not looking for handouts, if I couldn’t beat him then I don’t deserve to be in semis. simple as that”.

And Tennis Major’s own Simon Cambers was among those who pointed out that allowing lucky losers could also increase avenues for match-fixing.

For now, the debate has been put to rest. But you can be rest assured that it will rear it’s head again the next time the same scenario plays out again.

You might also like this

“I don’t want to go out there and not be competitive enough” – Rafael Nadal OUT of Wimbledon with abdominal injury

tennis majors

Foot fine, abdomen not – gritty Nadal prevails in five-setter with Fritz to keep Wimbledon hopes alive

tennis majors

Ailing Nadal finds a way past Fritz to keep calendar Slam hopes alive

tennis majors

“They told me I need to retire the match” – Nadal didn’t heed his box and soldiered on to victory

tennis majors

American, Kathy May, US Open: Everything you always wanted to know about Taylor Fritz (but never had time to find out) – updated after reaching final of 2024 ATP Finals

tennis majors